<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11 Dumb Things Almost Everyone Does With Their Mac but Won&#8217;t Admit.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/07/20/11-dumb-things-everyone-does-with-their-mac-but-wont-admit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/07/20/11-dumb-things-everyone-does-with-their-mac-but-wont-admit/</link>
	<description>Combining OS X with your life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Balogh</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/07/20/11-dumb-things-everyone-does-with-their-mac-but-wont-admit/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>David Balogh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=440#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>@Paul - Interesting article on the password length, however the key to it is having a &quot;three strikes&quot; rule to keep out the automated attacks. But that won&#039;t do you any good if you downloaded/sniffed the hash and ran it through an offline cracker. Or used a botnet to weasel around the 3 strikes policy.

I definitely agree that social engineering is a much easier way for someone to get your password, you don&#039;t even need to be a &quot;hacker&quot; to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; Interesting article on the password length, however the key to it is having a &#8220;three strikes&#8221; rule to keep out the automated attacks. But that won&#8217;t do you any good if you downloaded/sniffed the hash and ran it through an offline cracker. Or used a botnet to weasel around the 3 strikes policy.</p>
<p>I definitely agree that social engineering is a much easier way for someone to get your password, you don&#8217;t even need to be a &#8220;hacker&#8221; to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/07/20/11-dumb-things-everyone-does-with-their-mac-but-wont-admit/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=440#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention, there was a recent article that said that longer passwords aren&#039;t actually more secure.  6 characters is sufficient to deter hackers (and no, they take longer than a &quot;few minutes&quot; to crack by brute force).  By that point, they just go with social engineering instead of brute force attacks.

Check out:

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/strong_web_pass.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention, there was a recent article that said that longer passwords aren&#8217;t actually more secure.  6 characters is sufficient to deter hackers (and no, they take longer than a &#8220;few minutes&#8221; to crack by brute force).  By that point, they just go with social engineering instead of brute force attacks.</p>
<p>Check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/strong_web_pass.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/strong_web_pass.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/07/20/11-dumb-things-everyone-does-with-their-mac-but-wont-admit/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=440#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>In regards to the battery, you should run it to the ground at least once a month to maintain the capacity of the battery.  ie. Despite what many claim, lithium ion batteries *do* have memory.  Just not as bad as the old Ni-Cad batteries.

Check out Apple&#039;s support article for instructions on how to do this:

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1490

Also, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with keeping your Mac up and running.  Yes, periodically reboot (I usually do this after a software update), but one of the biggest advantages of a Mac over a PC is that sleep actually works!  And works well.  There has been many times where I&#039;ve kept the computer running for a month without rebooting without any issues at all.  

The one application that I do find that you have to quit and restart on occasion are web browsers.  (side rant: Can *anyone* make a browser that doesn&#039;t leak memory all over the place??  There&#039;s this huge race for the fastest web browser when I&#039;d rather have one that doesn&#039;t gobble memory!)  Occasionally restarting Mail also helps if you have a lot of emails.  Otherwise, there is little reason to reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the battery, you should run it to the ground at least once a month to maintain the capacity of the battery.  ie. Despite what many claim, lithium ion batteries *do* have memory.  Just not as bad as the old Ni-Cad batteries.</p>
<p>Check out Apple&#8217;s support article for instructions on how to do this:</p>
<p><a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1490" rel="nofollow">http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1490</a></p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with keeping your Mac up and running.  Yes, periodically reboot (I usually do this after a software update), but one of the biggest advantages of a Mac over a PC is that sleep actually works!  And works well.  There has been many times where I&#8217;ve kept the computer running for a month without rebooting without any issues at all.  </p>
<p>The one application that I do find that you have to quit and restart on occasion are web browsers.  (side rant: Can *anyone* make a browser that doesn&#8217;t leak memory all over the place??  There&#8217;s this huge race for the fastest web browser when I&#8217;d rather have one that doesn&#8217;t gobble memory!)  Occasionally restarting Mail also helps if you have a lot of emails.  Otherwise, there is little reason to reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
