<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create your own Apple TV with any Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/06/25/create-your-own-apple-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/06/25/create-your-own-apple-tv/</link>
	<description>Combining OS X with your life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:36:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: depression nerveuse</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/06/25/create-your-own-apple-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>depression nerveuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=407#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Hi...
I agree that Firewire 400 is indeed far faster than Gigabit Ethernet. But when it comes to Mac, it depends on whether you want to transfer mass data or small chunks of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230;<br />
I agree that Firewire 400 is indeed far faster than Gigabit Ethernet. But when it comes to Mac, it depends on whether you want to transfer mass data or small chunks of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Balogh</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/06/25/create-your-own-apple-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>David Balogh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=407#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>@Paul - It definitely depends on what you&#039;re transferring. Firewire excels at large file transfers with less overhead. Regardless, Apple TV doesn&#039;t even include a Gigabit connection (only 10/100) which won&#039;t come close at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; It definitely depends on what you&#8217;re transferring. Firewire excels at large file transfers with less overhead. Regardless, Apple TV doesn&#8217;t even include a Gigabit connection (only 10/100) which won&#8217;t come close at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.interrupt19.com/2009/06/25/create-your-own-apple-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interrupt19.com/?p=407#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Minor correction - Firewire 400 is actually faster than gigabit ethernet.  Unbelievable huh?  You can test it yourself.  I actually find that in order of speed:  Firewire 400 &gt; USB2  &gt; gigabit ethernet.  Theoretically, it should be the exact opposite, but the way Macs are designed, it doesn&#039;t seem to work that way.  It also depends on whether you transfer one large file or many small files and whether you transfer a lot of data (which is where Firewire shines).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor correction &#8211; Firewire 400 is actually faster than gigabit ethernet.  Unbelievable huh?  You can test it yourself.  I actually find that in order of speed:  Firewire 400 &gt; USB2  &gt; gigabit ethernet.  Theoretically, it should be the exact opposite, but the way Macs are designed, it doesn&#8217;t seem to work that way.  It also depends on whether you transfer one large file or many small files and whether you transfer a lot of data (which is where Firewire shines).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
